| Issue: |
Whether offences were extradition offences, whether extradition was unjust or oppressive in light of T’s physical and mental condition, whether the extradition proceedings were an abuse of process, whether extradition was barred by extraneous considerations, whether extradition should have been refused for risk of a breach of speciality, whether extradition breached Art 8 ECHR and whether the Attorney General’s guidance on concurrent jurisdiction should have been considered by the DPP in deciding not to prosecute A in the UK. |