|
Agius v Court of Magistrates, Malta |
| |
|
| Issue: |
Whether there was clear and cogent evidence to rebut the presumption that a Category 1 country would honour its human rights obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights. All authorities which required a human rights inquiry under s21 only in wholly exceptional circumstances were not to be followed. The correct approach was that given in Targosinski v Poland. |
| |
|
| Court: |
Administrative Court |
| |
|
| Reference: |
CO/9812/2010 |
| |
|
| Neutral Citation: |
[2011] EWHC 759 (Admin) |
| |
|
| Judge(s): |
Sullivan LJ, Maddison J |
| |
|
| Date: |
15 March 2011 |
