|
R v Pedley, Martin and Hamadi |
|
|
Issue: |
Whether the sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection was compatible with the requirements of Arts 3 and/or 5 ECHR unless the “significant risk of serious harm” test in the statute was understood to apply only if the risk amounted to “more likely than not” or at least a numerically-expressed test of more than 35-50%. |
|
|
Court: |
Court of Appeal |
|
|
Reference: |
2008 04933 A6 |
|
|
Neutral Citation: |
[2009] EWCA Crim 840 |
|
|
Judge(s): |
Hughes LJ, King J, HHJ Barker QC |
|
|
Date: |
14 May 2009 |