AG v Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland |
1 |
Issue: Whether a transcript of a Tribunal hearing should be made; the correct appeal procedure; whether the Tribunal should appear at an appeal. |
|
|
|
Elizabeth Byrne v Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland |
2 |
Issue: Whether a decision to deny an adjournment was lawful; whether the Tribunal had acted in excess of jurisdiction in extending a Compulsory Treatment Order |
|
|
|
Sarah Beattie v Peter Dunbar, Mental Health Officer, and Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland |
7 |
Issue: Whether an application to a Tribunal had been validly made in light of the incomplete nature of one of the medical recommendations |
|
|
|
Annie McGlynn v Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland |
16 |
Issue: Whether a Tribunal erred in failing to consider the making of an interim Compulsory Treatment Order in relation to a patient detained under a short term detention certificate |
|
|
|
In the Petition of John Smith (Mental Health Officer) |
17 |
Issue: Whether the Tribunal acted unlawfully in failing to hold a hearing within the statutory time limit |
|
|
|
Brian Paterson v Sandra Kent, Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland and Fife Health Board |
20 |
Issue: Whether a Tribunal had jurisdiction to consider an application when it sat outside the statutory time limit; whether a failure to make an interim Compulsory Treatment Order and adjourn to allow the patient to obtain legal representation and an independent medical report was lawful |
|
|
|
Duncan Hughes (Curatory Ad Litem to PH) v Mental Health Tribunal |
29 |
Issue: Whether the failure of the Tribunal to pay the expenses of a curator ad litem who was a solicitor, so that he could not attend a substantive hearing, breached Art 6 European Convention |
|
|
|
R v Agnes Jane Carpenter |
32 |
Issue: The appropriate tariff for a defendant convicted of murder who was the instigator of a contract killing, but suffered from a personality disorder arising from childhood abuse, and was depressed at the time, of impaired intelligence and had suffered a brain injury. |
|
|
|
R v Gareth Richard Horton |
35 |
Issue: The appropriate tariff for a defendant convicted of murder who suffered from a depressive disorder. |
|
|
|
R v Rajesh Kumar Dass |
37 |
Issue: The appropriate tariff for a defendant convicted of murder who had a psychotic disorder, a personality disorder and a brain injury. |
|
|
|
JE v DE (by his litigation friend, the Official Solicitor), Surrey County Council and EW |
39 |
Issue: Whether a patient in a care home had been deprived of his liberty for the purposes of Art 5 European Convention |
|
|
|
R v H (AG’s Reference No 126 of 2006) |
64 |
Issue: The appropriate tariff for a juvenile defendant convicted of murder who had an adjustment disorder. |
|
|
|
R (Johnson and others) v LB Havering; YL (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) v Birmingham City Council and others |
69 |
Issue: Whether previous authority holding that a private care home is not a public authority for the purposes of the Human Rights Act 1998 was binding and correct. |
|
|
|
YL (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) v Birmingham City Council |
85 |
Issue: Whether a private care home is a public authority for the purposes of the Human Rights Act 1998. |
|
|
|
R (TB) v Stafford Crown Court |
115 |
Issue: The procedure to be followed before a Crown Court orders the disclosure of the psychiatric records of a prosecution witness. |
|
|
|
R (Buckowicki) v Northamptonshire County Council |
121 |
Issue: Whether it was open to a local authority to decline to accept a client for guardianship when a criminal court wished to make a guardianship order |
|
|
|
M v UK |
129 |
Issue: Whether a friendly settlement should be approved; whether the absence of a provision allowing a patient to change her nearest relative breached Art 8 ECHR |
|
|
|
Sheffield City Council v E and S |
131 |
Issue: The test for capacity to marry. |
|
|
|
X City Council v MB, NB and MAB |
155 |
Issue: Whether capacity to marry includes capacity to engage in sexual relations; the test for capacity to engage in sexual relations. |
|
|
|
St Helens BC v PE and JW |
169 |
Issue: Whether declarations made under the inherent jurisdiction should affirm the lawfulness of conduct or merely that it was in the best interests of the subject. |
|
|
|
Local Authority X v MM and KM |
173 |
Issue: Whether MM had capacity to decide where to live, whether to marry or to have sexual relations; what her best interests required. |
|
|
|
City of Sunderland v PS and CA |
196 |
Issue: Whether deprivation of liberty could be authorised under the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction; whether a receiver could be appointed under s37 Supreme Court Act 1981 in relation to a vulnerable adult. |
|
|
|
LLBC v TG, JG and TR |
203 |
Issue: Whether an ex parte order for the placement in a care home of a man without capacity to decide where to live had been justified; whether it breached Arts 5 and 8 ECHR |
|
|
|
R (N) v Mental Health Review Tribunal |
219 |
Issue: Whether a tribunal had erred in concluding that a paedophile suffered from psychopathic disorder; whether a decision not to adjourn for oral evidence was unlawful. |
|
|
|
R (Holloway) v Oxfordshire County Council and Others |
225 |
Issue: Whether an ex parte interim displacement was properly sought; whether the order made was within the jurisdiction of the judge, and whether a s3 order made subsequently amounted to lawful detention. |
|
|
|
R (SH) v Mental Health Review Tribunal |
234 |
Issue: Whether the failure of a Tribunal to lift a requirement that a conditionally discharged patient accept medication that he was willing to accept on a voluntary basis breached his fundamental rights and so was unlawful. |
|
|
|
R (RD) v Mental Health Review Tribunal |
241 |
Issue: Whether a tribunal medical member had breached r11 Mental Health Review Tribunal Rules 1983 and/or Art 5(4) ECHR; the adequacy of the tribunal’s reasons. |
|
|
|
R (Rayner and Marsh) v Home Secretary and Others |
249 |
Issue: Whether the statutory scheme relating to the making of references to the Mental Health Review Tribunal following a recall to hospital of a conditionally discharged restricted patient and the timing of the hearing was compatible with Art 5(4) ECHR; whether there had been a breach of the right to a speedy hearing on the facts and who was responsible. |
|
|
|
CPS v P |
262 |
Issue: Whether a decision to stay a summary trial as the defendant could not participate was correct; whether the district judge should have proceeded under s37 Mental Health Act 1983; whether the defence of doli incapax remained. |
|
|
|
R (Surat Singh) v Stratford Magistrates Court |
274 |
Issue: The proper approach to issues of insanity arising in a summary trial |
|
|
|
Seal v Chief Constable of South Wales Police |
282 |
Issue: Whether a failure to obtain leave in accordance with s139 Mental Health Act 1983 before bringing civil proceedings in respect of acts purportedly done under the Act rendered the proceedings a nullity |
|
|
|
Kerrie Francis Gray v Thames Trains Ltd and Network Rail |
295 |
Issue: Whether a cause of action by a man suffering a mental disorder who committed a manslaughter was barred on public policy grounds. |
|
|
|
R (MM) v Home Secretary |
304 |
Issue: Whether warrants of recall in relation to a conditionally discharged patient were lawful |
|
|
|
R v Dean Johnson |
310 |
Issue: Whether in relation to insanity the issue was whether the defendant knew his action was legally or morally wrong |
|
|
|
R v Amolak Singh Chal |
313 |
Issue: Whether hearsay evidence was admissible in proceedings to determine whether an accused found unfit to stand trial had committed the actus reus of the offence charged. |
|
|
|
R v Daniel Richard House |
318 |
Issue: Whether a minimum term should have been specified in relation to a life sentence accompanied with a hospital direction |
|
|
|
R v Jonathan Paul Simpson |
320 |
Issue: Whether the judge had been correct to impose life imprisonment rather than a hospital order with a restriction order because of public safety concerns |
|
|
|