Register
Log in
Shopping cart
(0)
You have no items in your shopping cart.
New Zealand Dollar
US Dollar
British Pound
Australian Dollar
Canadian Dollar
Euro
Hong Kong Dollar
Home page
Recent Law Reports
Search
My account
Contact us
Subscription
Categories
Inquest Law Reports (457)
Police Law Reports (431)
Prison Law Reports (738)
Extradition Law Reports (512)
Mental Health Law Reports (1076)
2024 (17)
2023 (42)
2022 (43)
2021 (40)
2020 (10)
2019 (31)
2018 (28)
2017 (41)
2016 (40)
2015 (63)
2014 (50)
2013 (38)
2012 (45)
2011 (57)
2010 (57)
2009 (49)
2008 (48)
2007 (37)
2006 (47)
2005 (36)
2004 (40)
2003 (49)
2002 (59)
2001 (41)
2000 (37)
1999 (31)
Books (2)
Subscriptions (7)
Authors / Contributors
Kris Gledhill
John Jones QC
Bridget Dolan KC
Debra Powell KC
Jeremy Johnson QC
Briony Ballard
Information
Contact us
About us
Recent Law Reports
Recently viewed products
Sitemap
Privacy Notice
Conditions of Use
Newsletter
Sign up for our newsletter:
Wait...
Home
/
Mental Health Law Reports
/
2022
/
Request for an advisory opinion under Art 29 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine
Request for an advisory opinion under Art 29 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine
Author / Contributor:
Kris Gledhill
Be the first to review this product
€
14.04
Qty:
Request for an advisory opinion under Art 29 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine
Issue:
Whether the ECtHR had competence to give an advisory opinion as to (i) what “protective conditions” were required to secure respect for integrity without discrimination when a person was detained for involuntary psychiatric treatment to protect their health and (ii) whether the same protective conditions were required in relation to involuntary treatment to protect others.
Court:
ECtHR Grand Chamber
Reference:
Request No A47-2021-001
Neutral Citation:
Judge(s):
R Spano (President), JF Kjølbro, K Turkovic, P Lemmens, S O’Leary, Y Grozev, C Ranzoni, A Harutyunyan, G Kucsko-Stadlmayer, A Polácková, M Bošnjak, T Eicke, J Ilievski, L Chanturia, M Elósegui, R Sabato, L Schembri Orland
Date:
44454