2006
|
|
Cases Reported |
| R (Parminder Singh and others) v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police | 1 |
| Issue: Whether the use of a dispersal direction under s30 Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2003 in order to disperse protesters was lawful | |
| Sierny v DPP | 10 |
| Issue: Whether a failure to provide any explanation of the grounds upon which a dispersal authorisation under s30(4) Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2003 had been made rendered the authorisation invalid. | |
| Chief Constable of Merseyside Police v Hickman and another | 14 |
| Issue: Whether cash seized under s19 PACE can be re-seized subsequently under s294 Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 | |
| French and others v Chief Constable of Sussex | 19 |
| Issue: Whether claims for psychiatric damage caused to police officers as a result of a shooting which had been caused by corporate failings were sustainable | |
| R (Jones) v Chief Constable of Cheshire | 24 |
| Issue: Whether a chief constable has power to revoke or suspend a certificate granted under the Pedlars Act 1871 | |
| R (Gillan and another) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and another | 26 |
| Issue: Whether the use of stop and search powers under ss43-47 of the Terrorism Act 2000 was lawful | |
| Van Colle v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police | 47 |
| Issue: Whether there had been breaches of Arts 2 and 8 ECHR where a prosecution witness, who had reported instances of intimidation and had not been given any protection, was murdered | |
| ‘Laurence’ v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis | 77 |
| Issue: Whether a former informer who intended to bring a claim relating to insufficient protection should be given pre-action disclosure | |
| R (Haw) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis | 79 |
| Issue: Whether the statutory prohibition of protests in the vicinity of Parliament applied to protests that had commenced before the Act came into force | |
| Scott v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire | 86 |
| Issue: Whether there was a duty to disclose unsubstantiated complaints against a police officer in a police civil action | |
| Reading Festival Ltd v West Yorkshire Police Authority | 91 |
| Issue: Whether the cost of policing a music festival could be recovered from the organisers | |
| R (W) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and the London Borough of Richmond-upon-Thames | 102 |
| Issue: Whether s30(6) of the Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2003 confers a power to use force in removing a young person to his place of residence | |
| R (Kay) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis | 111 |
| Issue: Whether notice under s11 of the Public Order Act 1986 had to be given of a mass cycle ride that was held at the same time and departing from the same location on the last Friday of each month | |
| Manley v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis | 117 |
| Issue: Whether an award of just £1,500 for malicious prosecution with no award of aggravated or exemplary damages was, in the circumstances, a decision to which no reasonable jury could have come | |
| R (Bennett) v HM Coroner for Inner South London; Officers A and B (First and Second Interested Parties) and Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Third Interested Party) | 123 |
| Issue: Whether the requirement in Art 2 ECHR that state agents should use no more force than absolutely necessary differed materially from the English common law test of using such force as was reasonable in self-defence or in defence of another; whether the coroner had erred in refusing to leave a verdict of unlawful killing to the jury | |
| R (Mondelly) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis | 134 |
| Issue: Whether a caution for possession of cannabis was unlawful as a result of a general policy against arresting for possession of cannabis except where aggravating features were present | |
| C v The Police and Secretary of State for the Home Department | 151 |
| Issue: Whether Part II of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 applied to surveillance undertaken of a police officer in relation to a disability pension claim | |
| N v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police | 160 |
| Issue: Whether the Chief Constable was vicariously liable for a rape committed by a police officer who was purporting to act as such | |
| Karagozlu v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis | 166 |
| Issue: Whether transfer from an open prison to a closed prison amounts to sufficient damage to found a claim in misfeasance | |
| R (Da Silva) v DPP and Independent Police Complaints Commission | 176 |
| Issue: Whether a decision not to prosecute a police officer for the shooting of a member of the public should be quashed, and whether there should be disclosure of the underlying evidence | |
| Rowlands v Chief Constable of Merseyside | 187 |
| Issue: Whether it had been appropriate not to award aggravated or exemplary damages in a false imprisonment and malicious prosecution claim | |
| Chief Constable of Merseyside Police v Harrison | 198 |
| Issue: The appropriate standard of proof in applications for a closure order under s2 of the Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2003 | |
| R (Errington) v Metropolitan Police Authority | 203 |
| Issue: Whether the jurisdiction to entertain an application for a closure order depends on the validity of the closure notice; whether a closure notice was valid; whether the authorising officer could rely on hearsay evidence; and which statutory requirements were governed by the 3 month time limit | |
| Keegan v UK | 210 |
| Issue: Whether the execution of a search warrant which had not been maliciously obtained nevertheless amounted to a breach of the applicants’ rights under Art 8 ECHR because insufficient enquiries had been made before it was obtained | |
| Barracks v Coles and another | 217 |
| Issue: Whether the Employment Tribunal had been right to strike out the defence to a race discrimination claim because the Commissioner refused to disclose (a) the reason why a black police officer had not been selected for a post and (b) the legal basis relied on for non-disclosure | |
| Ashley and another v Chief Constable of Sussex Police | 227 |
| Issue: Whether, in a claim for damages arising out of the shooting of a man by police, there should be disclosure of reports into the incident, the burden of proof and test for self-defence, and whether there should be a strike out of claims in battery and misfeasance, negligence having been admitted | |
| R (Singh) v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police | 261 |
| Issue: Whether the use of a dispersal direction under s30 Anti-social Behaviour Act 2003 in order to disperse protesters was lawful | |
| Connor and others v Chief Constable of Merseyside | 280 |
| Issue: Whether issues of reasonable and probable cause and malice should have been left to the jury; whether officers executing a Firearms Act warrant were entitled to use force; and whether the judge had been biased and made prejudicial remarks | |
| Hasan v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis | 295 |
| Issue: Whether absolute immunity from suit applied to the process of dismissing a probationer police constable under reg 13 of the Police Regulations 2003 | |
| Chand and others v Metropolitan Police Service | 301 |
| Issue: Whether the interception of telephone calls by a police officer on a private telecommunications system was lawful | |
| R (Laporte) v Chief Constable of Gloucestershire Police | 309 |
| Issue: Whether officers had been entitled to stop coaches of protestors attending a demonstration at RAF Fairford, and whether they had been entitled forcibly to return the coaches under escort to London | |
| R (Dennis) v DPP | 343 |
| Issue: Whether a decision not to prosecute for gross-negligence manslaughter should be quashed | |
View as
Sort by
Display
per page
